Segmentation is one of the most salient characteristics of arthropods, and
differentiation of segments along the body axis is the basis of arthropod d
iversification. This article evaluates whether the evolution of segmentatio
n involves the differentiation of already independent units, i.e., do segme
nts evolve as modules? Because arthropod segmental differentiation is commo
nly equated with differential character of appendages, we analyze appendage
s by comparing similarities and differences in their development. The compa
rison of arthropod limbs, even between species, is a comparison of serially
repeated structures. Arthropod limbs are not only reiterated along the bod
y axis, but limbs themselves can be viewed as being composed of reiterated
parts. The interpretation of such reiterated structures from an evolutionar
y viewpoint is far from obvious. One common view is that serial repetition
is evidence of a modular organization, i.e., repeated structures with a com
mon fundamental identity that develop semi-autonomously and are free to div
ersify independently. In this article, we evaluate arthropod limbs from a d
evelopmental perspective and ask: are all arthropod limbs patterned using a
similar set of mechanisms which would reflect that they all share a generi
c coordinate patterning system? Using Drosophila as a basis for comparison,
we find that appendage primordia, positioned along the body using segmenta
l patterning coordinates, do indeed have elements of common identity. Howev
er, we do not find evidence of a single coordinate system shared either bet
ween limbs or among limb branches. Data concerning the other diagnostic of
developmental modularity-semi-autonomy of development-are not currently ava
ilable for sufficient taxa. Nonetheless, some data comparing patterns of mo
rphogenesis provide evidence that limbs cannot always be temporally or spat
ially decoupled from the development of their neighbors, suggesting that se
gment modularity is a derived character. (C) 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc.