Surgical management and outcomes in patients with median nerve lesions

Citation
Dh. Kim et al., Surgical management and outcomes in patients with median nerve lesions, J NEUROSURG, 95(4), 2001, pp. 584-594
Citations number
19
Categorie Soggetti
Neurology,"Neurosciences & Behavoir
Journal title
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY
ISSN journal
00223085 → ACNP
Volume
95
Issue
4
Year of publication
2001
Pages
584 - 594
Database
ISI
SICI code
0022-3085(200110)95:4<584:SMAOIP>2.0.ZU;2-8
Abstract
Object. One hundred sixty-seven of 250 patients with median nerve (MN) lesi ons, excluding carpal tunnel syndrome and nerve sheath tumors, at the level s of the arm, elbow, forearm, and wrist, underwent surgical treatment at Lo uisiana State University Health Sciences over a 30-year period. The most co mmon causes of MN injuries were laceration, fracture-associated stretch and contusion, gunshot wound, compression, and injection injuries. In this stu dy, surgically treated patients were followed and evaluated retrospectively for favorable functional outcomes. Methods. Lesions not in continuity required primary or secondary end-to-end suture or graft repairs. With the aid of direct intraoperative recording o f nerve action potentials (NAPs), MN injuries in which the lesion was in co ntinuity underwent external or internal neurolysis, or resection of the les ion, followed by end-to-end suture or graft repair. A minimum of 12 months follow-up review (mean 18 months) was available in 85% of the surgically tr eated patients. For lesions in continuity, a functional recovery of Grade 3 or better was s een in 72 (95%) of 76 patients who underwent neurolysis, 18 (86%) of 21 who received suture repair, and 21 (75%) of 28 who received graft repair. In l esions not in continuity, favorable results (Grade greater than or equal to 3) were seen in 10 (91%) of 11 patients who received primary suture repair , seven (78%) of nine who received secondary suture repair, and 15 (69%) of 22 who received graft repair. Conclusions. Surgical intervention for MN injuries with complete or severe deficits achieved favorable outcomes.