Rb. Soyer et al., Further assessment of the construct validity of four measures of narcissism: Replication and extension, J PSYCHOL, 135(3), 2001, pp. 245-258
The authors build on earlier research by L. S. Mullins and R. E. Kopelman (
1988) and R. E. Kopelman and L. S. Mullins (1992) to reexamine the construc
t validity of four narcissism scales: the Margolis-Thomas Measure of Narcis
sism (MT; H. D. Margolis & V. A. Thomas, 1980), the Narcissistic Personalit
y Disorder Scale (NPDS; H. U. Ashby, R. R. Lee, & E. H. Duke, 1979), the Na
rcissism-Hypersensitivity subscale of the MMPI, Scale 5, Masculinity-Femini
nity (NHMF; K. Serkownek, 1975), and the Narcissistic Personality Inventory
(NPI; R. Raskin & C. S. Hall, 1979). The present analysis included the rev
ised NPI and its factors along, with four measures of satisfaction and a nu
mber of other previously assessed variables. The MT exhibited the strongest
validity, correlating positively with conceptually related constructs such
as Machiavellianism, nonsignificantly with unrelated measures like the nee
d to achieve, and inversely with all four satisfaction scales. Contrasts be
tween the NPI and NPDS and NHMF seemed to parallel recent differentiations
between overt and covert narcissism, but data for the NPI factors suggested
instead that the four narcissism scales helped describe a complex psycholo
gical continuum related to adjustment.