Differentiation of atypical atrioventricular node re-entrant tachycardia from orthodromic reciprocating tachycardia using a septal accessory, pathwayby the response to ventricular pacing
Gf. Michaud et al., Differentiation of atypical atrioventricular node re-entrant tachycardia from orthodromic reciprocating tachycardia using a septal accessory, pathwayby the response to ventricular pacing, J AM COL C, 38(4), 2001, pp. 1163-1167
Citations number
12
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems","Cardiovascular & Hematology Research
OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to determine whether the response
to ventricular pacing during tachycardia is useful for differentiating atyp
ical atrioventricular node re-entrant tachycardia (AVNRT) from orthodromic
reciprocating tachycardia (ORT) using a septal accessory pathway.
BACKGROUND Although it is usually possible to differentiate atypical AVNRT
from CRT using a septal accessory pathway, a definitive diagnosis is occasi
onally elusive.
METHODS In 30 patients with atypical AVNRT and 44 patients with ORT using a
septal accessory pathway, the right ventricle was paced at a cycle length
10 to 40 ms shorter than the tachycardia cycle length (TCL). The ventriculo
-atrial (VA) interval and TCL were measured just before pacing. The interva
l between the last pacing stimulus and the last entrained atrial depolariza
tion (stimulus-atrial [S-A] interval) and the post-pacing inter-Val (PPI) a
t the right ventricular apex were measured on cessation of ventricular paci
ng.
RESULTS All 30 patients with atypical AVNRT and none of the 44 patients wit
h ORT using a septal accessory pathway had an S-A-VA interval > 85 ms and P
PI-TCL > 115 ms.
CONCLUSIONS The S-A-VA interval and PPI-TCL are useful in distinguishing at
ypical AVNRT from CRT using a septal accessory pathway. (C) 2001 by the Ame
rican College of Cardiology.