A. Schubert et al., Evidence of a current and lasting national anesthesia personnel shortfall:Scope and implications, MAYO CLIN P, 76(10), 2001, pp. 995-1010
Citations number
55
Categorie Soggetti
General & Internal Medicine","Medical Research General Topics
Objectives: To prove the existence of a current anesthesiologist shortage a
nd to project the balance of labor supply and demand in the future.
Methods: To quantify the current supply we used published health personnel
data from federal agencies and the American Medical Association, as well as
membership data from the American Society of Anesthesiologists. We estimat
ed anesthesiologist supply in 2001 based on the number of graduating reside
nts and fellows, taking into account the loss of a portion of graduating re
sidents due to temporary visa status. We assumed that neither a shortage no
r an oversupply existed in 1994 and that demand for anesthesiologists was a
pproximated by the number of surgical procedures reported by federal agenci
es. In modeling future supply and demand for anesthesiologists, we assumed
that the current health care policy and economic climates will continue. We
extrapolated demand using 1.5% to 3% yearly growth rates based on a synthe
sis of recent and projected procedure growth rates, procedure rates for the
elderly, and population aging trends. We estimated the supply for 2001 thr
ough 2003 based on the current resident cohort modified by their projected
graduation rate. Accounting for attrition during residency and the effect o
f fellowship training, we assumed that after 2003 the number of American me
dical graduates will initially increase by 15% annually and that the number
of international medical graduates will decrease to a stable level of 500
trained each year. We assumed an average retirement age of 65 years.
Results: Our model suggests that there is currently a 3.6% to 10.9% shortag
e of anesthesiologists nationwide, depending on the assumption of a 2% or 3
% increase in annual demand since 1994 and a constant pattern of work distr
ibution by anesthesia providers. This amounts to ap proximately 1200 to 380
0 anesthesiologists. If projected demand continues to increase at the rate
of 1.5% to 2% annually, the shortfall will amount to 2.6% to 12.0% of the l
abor supply by 2005, representing a deficit of 1000 to 4500 anesthesiologis
ts. By 2010, this shortfall is projected to disappear or continue to amount
to about 11% of the anesthesiologist supply, depending on the assumptions
about the rate of demand for anesthesiologists. Compared with the expected
graduating class of 1100 anesthesiology residents in 2001, our model calls
for nearly 1600 graduates by 2005 and 2000 by 2010.
Conclusion: A substantive shortfall of anesthesia personnel exists in 2001
and will continue for years to come, fueled by changing population demograp
hics, population health trends, and accelerating advancements in surgical t
echnology, as well as growth in ambulatory and office-based surgery, pain m
edicine, and intensive care. In addition to focusing on financing, national
health policy needs to address the adequacy of health care personnel resou
rces for an aging population, in particular when they require surgery, are
afflicted by painful conditions, or become critically ill.