Muscle strength and fatigue during isokinetic exercise in individuals withmultiple sclerosis

Citation
Cp. Lambert et al., Muscle strength and fatigue during isokinetic exercise in individuals withmultiple sclerosis, MED SCI SPT, 33(10), 2001, pp. 1613-1619
Citations number
18
Categorie Soggetti
Medical Research General Topics
Journal title
MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE
ISSN journal
01959131 → ACNP
Volume
33
Issue
10
Year of publication
2001
Pages
1613 - 1619
Database
ISI
SICI code
0195-9131(200110)33:10<1613:MSAFDI>2.0.ZU;2-W
Abstract
Purpose: To compare muscle strength and muscle fatigue of the knee extensor s and flexors in individuals with multiple sclerosis (MS) and non-MS contro l subjects and to evaluate the reliability of muscle strength and muscle fa tigue testing in these individuals. Methods: Thirty individuals (13 women a nd 2 men for both MS and control groups), age (mean +/- SD) 38.8 +/- 10 for MS and 33.1 +/-7.6 yr for controls, participated in this investigation. Pe ak torque was measured on two occasions separated by approximately 7 d at 3 0, 60, 90,120,180 degrees .s(-1) with 2 min of recovery between each bout. The nondominant leg was tested followed by the dominant leg after 10 min of recovery. Subjects then performed three bouts of 30 flexions and extension s of the dominant leg at 180.s(-1) with 1 min of recovery between bouts. Re sults: The reliability of muscle torque was very high for individuals with MS (only 1 of 20 measurements with an ICC below 0.900). Total work was also highly reliable for MS, but the Fatigue Index (work during the last 15 con tractions/work during the first 15 contractions) x 100 was not. Peak torque adjusted for age, body mass, and fat free mass (measured by whole body ple thysmography; the Bod Pod; Life Measurement Instruments; Concord, CA) was s ignificantly greater for controls than for MS for three of four lower body muscle groups tested. For the muscle fatigue test (3 bouts of 30 knee exten sions and flexions at 180 degrees .s(-1)), the Fatigue Index was greater (l ess fatigue) for the knee extensors for controls than MS for the third bout . For flexion, the Fatigue Index was greater for controls than MS over the three bouts (group effect). Total work was significantly greater for contro ls than MS for the flexors (group effect) and approached significance for t he extensors. Conclusions: Individuals with MS were weaker than controls wh en data were adjusted for age, body mass, and fat free mass. This latter fi nding (force relative to age and fat free mass) suggests that there is a re duced ability to activate muscle mass in MS and/or the muscle mass of indiv iduals with MS is of lower quality (i.e., reduced force/unit muscle mass) t han controls.