The effects of joint angle and reliability on knee proprioception

Citation
Dm. Pincivero et al., The effects of joint angle and reliability on knee proprioception, MED SCI SPT, 33(10), 2001, pp. 1708-1712
Citations number
23
Categorie Soggetti
Medical Research General Topics
Journal title
MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE
ISSN journal
01959131 → ACNP
Volume
33
Issue
10
Year of publication
2001
Pages
1708 - 1712
Database
ISI
SICI code
0195-9131(200110)33:10<1708:TEOJAA>2.0.ZU;2-S
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to examine the reliability and effec ts of knee angle on the detection and subsequent response to passive knee m ovement. Methods: Twenty college-aged male and 20 female volunteers were ev aluated for proprioception by a newly developed perturbation test. Subjects were in a prone position on an isokinetic chair with their right lower leg attached to a freely moving resistance adapter. The knee was placed in a s tarting position of 15, 30, or 60 degrees of flexion. While relaxed, the kn ee was dropped into extension, and the subjects were instructed to "catch t heir leg" when movement was perceived. Five trials were completed at each a ngle, in a random order. An electrogoniometer was secured to the lateral po rtion of the knee in order to measure angular displacement after perturbati on in two specific phases: detection (displacement from leg release to move ment cessation) and response (displacement from movement cessation to peak knee flexion). A three-factor ANOVA (two repeated factors (knee angle and p roprioception phase) and one between factor (gender)) was performed on the average and standard deviation of the five trials for significant main effe cts and interactions. Results: The results demonstrated a significant phase by angle interaction, and no gender effect. It was shown that at a more ex tended knee joint position (15 degrees), significantly less knee movement o ccurred before perception, followed by a greater response, than in a more f lexed position (30 and 60 degrees). Conclusion: The major findings of this study suggest that the detection of passive knee movement, and the subseque nt voluntary response, may be dependent on joint angle. Considerations of t he present method for proprioception assessment are warranted to enhance te st-retest reliability.