Purpose: The recommendations for exercise training and physical activity fo
r older adults include cardiovascular and resistance training components (C
VT and RT, respectively). The purpose of the present investigation was to c
ompare the fitness benefits of concurrent CVT and RT with those attained th
rough an equivalent duration of CVT or RT alone. Methods: Thirty-six partic
ipants (ages 60-84) were assigned to a control group or to one of three exe
rcise treatment groups. The treatment groups exercised three times per week
for 12 wk using RT (N = 11), CVT (N = 10), or CVT and RT (BOTH, N = 9). Pr
e- and post-training, participants performed a submaximal exercise test (GX
T), five repetition-maximum strength tests (5RM), and the AAHPERD functiona
l fitness test for older adults. Results: All exercise treatment groups rev
ealed lower resting heart rate and rate-pressure product; lower exercise di
astolic blood pressure and rating of perceived exertion; increased GXT dura
tion; increased leg, back, and shoulder 5RM scores; and improved AAHPERD fl
exibility, coordination, and cardiovascular endurance scores. The exercise
treatment groups responded differently on the following: RT and BOTH enhanc
ed arm and chest strength more than CVT; and BOTH enhanced AAHPERD strength
and agility scores more than CVT or RT. Conclusions: Concurrent CVT and RT
is as effective in eliciting improvements in cardiovascular fitness and 5R
M performance as CVT or RT, respectively. Moreover, incorporating both CVT
and RT in exercise programs for older adults may be more effective in optim
izing aspects of functional fitness than programs that involve only one com
ponent.