There is a high degree of consensus between the contributors to this volume
on the neural correlates of attention. This agreement relates both to the
implicit framework the authors apply to their studies of attention and also
to the brain regions that are implicated. In this epilogue I will attempt
to make explicit tile framework that is used and will explore the assumptio
ns that underlie the rules used for identifying the sites of attentional mo
dulation and the sources of the modulatory signals. These assumptions have
proved very useful, but most still require further investigation. The disti
nction between bottom-up and top-down processes is a key components of the
framework, but is also a potential source of confusion. It seems that botto
m-up processing, in the psychological sense of not being under voluntary co
ntrol, can involve top-down processes in the physiological sense of involvi
ng the feedback of neural signals. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. All right
s reserved.