Monitoring of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa sensitivity to antibiotics in France and spreading of betalactamine resistance mechanisms: GERPB 1999 study

Citation
Jd. Cavallo et al., Monitoring of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa sensitivity to antibiotics in France and spreading of betalactamine resistance mechanisms: GERPB 1999 study, PATH BIOL, 49(7), 2001, pp. 534-539
Citations number
15
Categorie Soggetti
Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Journal title
PATHOLOGIE BIOLOGIE
ISSN journal
03698114 → ACNP
Volume
49
Issue
7
Year of publication
2001
Pages
534 - 539
Database
ISI
SICI code
0369-8114(200109)49:7<534:MOTPAS>2.0.ZU;2-S
Abstract
A prospective survey was carried out in october 1999 in 15 french teaching hospitals. Average susceptibility rates, determined by minimal inhibitory c oncentrations, for the 738 non-repetitive strains of R aeruginosa isolated were: ticarcillin, 58%, ticarcillin + clavulanic acid, 56%, piperacillin, 7 3%, piperacillin + tazobactam, 82%, ceftazidime, 76%, cefepime, 53%, cetpir ome, 36%, aztreonam, 58%, imipenem, 81%, amikacin, 62%, tobramycine, 71% an d, ciprofloxacin, 60%. Among the 75% serotypable strains, the most frequent serotypes were, O : 6 (15.3%), O : 11 (14.5%), O : 1 (10.4%), O : 3 (7.9%) , O : 4 (6.1%) and O : 12 (6.1%). The serotype O : 12 was the most resistan t to antibiotics. Forty-two percent of the strains were resistant or presen ted an intermediate susceptibility to ticarcillin. Mechanisms were as follo w: 14.5% non enzymatic mechanism, 12.5% overproduction of the constitutive cephalosporinase, 7.1% transferable betalactamase and, 6.9% combination of these mechanisms. Among the 67 transferable betalactamases: 48 (71.6%) were PSE-1, 12 (19.4%) TEM-2 and 6 (7.5%) oxacillinases. One extended spectrum betalactamase was characterized, Among the cephalosporines tested, cefepime was less affected by the overproduction of constitutive cephalosporinase. Ceftazidime, remained the best cephalosporin except against the strains ove rexpressing the chromosomal type 1 beta-lactamase. Resistance to tobramycin was mainly due to enzymatic mechanisms with a high level of resistance. De creased susceptibility was more frequent for amikacin than for tobramycin. This was probably related with non enzymatic mechanisms. (C) 2001 Editions scientifiques et medicales Elsevier SAS.