M. Chomarat et al., Evaluation of the E-test (R) and ATB-pneumo (R) kit for the determination of MIC of betalactamines for streptococcus pneumoniae in daily practice, PATH BIOL, 49(7), 2001, pp. 548-552
In 1999, during the survey of resistance of Streptococcus pneumoniae to ant
ibiotics by 31 clinical laboratories of Rhone-Alpes area, MIC to penicillin
(F), amoxicillin (AMX) and cefotaxime (CTX) of 877 PRP strains or with a d
iameter of inhibition to oxacillin inferior to 26 mm, were determined by ea
ch institution by E-test (n = 220 strains) or ATB-PNEUMO(R) (n = 657 strain
s). MICs of these three antibiotics were determined by dilution in agar med
ium by the coordinating center, The essential agreement was respectively fo
r ATB-PNEUMO(R) andE-test((R)) 89% versus 84% for P (p > 0.05), of 86% vs 7
9% for AMX (p < 0.01), and of 91 % vs 86% for CTX (p = 0.03). When the stra
ins were classified in clinical category, the differences were significant
(p < 0.001) for AMX (85% vs 71 %) and for CTX (82% vs 75%) but not for P (7
3% vs 78%'). ATB-PNEUMO(R) method was more sensitive than E-test for the de
tection of strains susceptible to P (90 vs 7391.), to AMX (83 vs 7811.) and
to CTX (80 vs 72%) and for the,strains intermediate to AMX (90 vs 78%). On
the contrary E-test is more specific than ATB-PNEUMO(R) for the detection
of P-resistant strains (94 vs 86%). Finally, the specificity of both method
s is the same for detection of P-S, AMX-R and CTX-I strains. (C) 2001 Editi
ons scientifiques et medicales Elsevier SAS.