Evaluation of the E-test (R) and ATB-pneumo (R) kit for the determination of MIC of betalactamines for streptococcus pneumoniae in daily practice

Citation
M. Chomarat et al., Evaluation of the E-test (R) and ATB-pneumo (R) kit for the determination of MIC of betalactamines for streptococcus pneumoniae in daily practice, PATH BIOL, 49(7), 2001, pp. 548-552
Citations number
13
Categorie Soggetti
Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Journal title
PATHOLOGIE BIOLOGIE
ISSN journal
03698114 → ACNP
Volume
49
Issue
7
Year of publication
2001
Pages
548 - 552
Database
ISI
SICI code
0369-8114(200109)49:7<548:EOTE(A>2.0.ZU;2-G
Abstract
In 1999, during the survey of resistance of Streptococcus pneumoniae to ant ibiotics by 31 clinical laboratories of Rhone-Alpes area, MIC to penicillin (F), amoxicillin (AMX) and cefotaxime (CTX) of 877 PRP strains or with a d iameter of inhibition to oxacillin inferior to 26 mm, were determined by ea ch institution by E-test (n = 220 strains) or ATB-PNEUMO(R) (n = 657 strain s). MICs of these three antibiotics were determined by dilution in agar med ium by the coordinating center, The essential agreement was respectively fo r ATB-PNEUMO(R) andE-test((R)) 89% versus 84% for P (p > 0.05), of 86% vs 7 9% for AMX (p < 0.01), and of 91 % vs 86% for CTX (p = 0.03). When the stra ins were classified in clinical category, the differences were significant (p < 0.001) for AMX (85% vs 71 %) and for CTX (82% vs 75%) but not for P (7 3% vs 78%'). ATB-PNEUMO(R) method was more sensitive than E-test for the de tection of strains susceptible to P (90 vs 7391.), to AMX (83 vs 7811.) and to CTX (80 vs 72%) and for the,strains intermediate to AMX (90 vs 78%). On the contrary E-test is more specific than ATB-PNEUMO(R) for the detection of P-resistant strains (94 vs 86%). Finally, the specificity of both method s is the same for detection of P-S, AMX-R and CTX-I strains. (C) 2001 Editi ons scientifiques et medicales Elsevier SAS.