Threatening stimuli are processed differently from neutral ones by anxious
and obsessive-compulsive subjects. In the present research, processing of t
hreatening words was compared with that of neutral words for two groups of
Italian students, one with high mean and one with low mean score on Checkin
g, a subscale of the Padua Inventory. Two tests were given, a computerized
version of the emotional Stroop task and a later recognition test under inc
idental learning conditions. The expected interference effect on the Stroop
task for those scoring high on Checking was confirmed. These results sugge
st an association between compulsive checking and bias in the first automat
ic stages of processing of threatening stimuli.