K. Brennan et al., Individual differences in sucrose consumption in the rat: motivational andneurochemical correlates of hedonia, PSYCHOPHAR, 157(3), 2001, pp. 269-276
Rationale: Rats exhibit marked individual differences in consumption of fre
ely available sucrose; however, the underlying mechanism(s) contributing to
such interindividual differences remain unclear. Objectives: The current s
tudy examined whether: 1) motivational differences (as reflected by the deg
ree of operant output to procure sucrose reward) underlie variability in su
gar consumption, and 2) whether potential differences in dopaminergic and/o
r opioidergic systems contribute to such differences. Methods: In the initi
al experiment, Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into those that spontaneous
ly consumed High or Low amounts of sucrose, based on the consumption of fre
ely available sugar (+/-2 SD from group median) over 7 consecutive test day
s. The potential differences in their motivation to seek and "earn" sucrose
solution rewards were measured using the progressive ratio (PR) schedule o
f reinforcement. Results: Performance of both groups on the PR schedule was
sensitive to the concentration of sucrose (i.e. the higher the concentrati
on, the greater the behavioral output). Furthermore, the High sucrose consu
mers earned a greater number of reinforcements (20% sucrose solution) than
the Low group. Parenthetically, the degree of behavioral output by the High
(but not the Low) group was comparable to that emitted for water under wat
er-deprived condition. Treatment with the opioid antagonist, naloxone, atte
nuated PR performance for sucrose, whereas d-amphetamine (0.5 mg/kg) enhanc
ed it. Furthermore, naloxone attenuated amphetamine-enhanced responding for
sucrose reward, suggesting an interaction between the dopaminergic and opi
oidergic systems in the mediation of sucrose reward. Conclusions: These res
ults support the contention that motivational differences may partially acc
ount for individual variability in sucrose consumption, and that dopaminerg
ic and/or opioidergic agents differentially affect the "wanting" and/or "li
king" of sucrose in the High and Low sucrose consumers.