Gp. Siegmund et al., Mechanical evidence of cervical facet capsule injury during whiplash - A cadaveric study using combined shear, compression, and extension loading, SPINE, 26(19), 2001, pp. 2095-2101
Study Design. A comparison of cervical facet capsule strain fields in cadav
eric motion segments exposed to whiplash-like loads and failure loads.
Objectives. To compare the maximum principal strain in the facet capsular l
igament under combined shear, bending, and compressive loads with those req
uired to injure the ligament.
Summary of Background Data. The cervical facet capsular ligament is thought
to be an anatomic site for whiplash injury, although the mechanism of its
injury remains unclear.
Methods. Motion segments from seven female donors were exposed to quasi-sta
tic flexibility tests using posterior shear loads of 135 N applied to the s
uperior vertebra under four compressive axial preloads up to 325 N. The rig
ht facet joint was then isolated and failed in posterior shear loading. The
Lagrangian strain field in the right facet capsular ligament was calculate
d from capsular displacements determined by stereophotogrammetry. Statistic
al analyses examined the effect of axial compression on motion segment flex
ibility, and compared maximum principal capsular strain between the flexibi
lity and failure tests.
Results. Capsular strain increased with applied shear load but did not vary
with axial compressive load. The maximum principal strain reached during t
he flexibility tests was 61% +/- 33% of that observed in subcatastrophic fa
ilures of the isolated joints. Two specimens reached strains in their flexi
bility tests that were larger than their corresponding strains at subcatast
rophic failure in the failure tests.
Conclusions. The cervical facet capsular ligaments may be inured under whip
lash-like loads of combined shear, bending, and compression. The results pr
ovide a mechanical basis basis for injury caused by whiplash loading.