Residual trees: wildlife associations and recommendations

Citation
Je. Hunter et Ml. Bond, Residual trees: wildlife associations and recommendations, WILDL SOC B, 29(3), 2001, pp. 995-999
Citations number
28
Categorie Soggetti
Environment/Ecology
Journal title
WILDLIFE SOCIETY BULLETIN
ISSN journal
00917648 → ACNP
Volume
29
Issue
3
Year of publication
2001
Pages
995 - 999
Database
ISI
SICI code
0091-7648(200123)29:3<995:RTWAAR>2.0.ZU;2-Y
Abstract
Managers and researchers have devoted considerable attention to old-growth forests and specific components of these forests such as snags and large wo ody debris. Large green residual or remnant trees have been less emphasized . Within the intensively managed coastal redwood (Sequoia sempervirens) for ests of northwestern California, these residual trees are often the only re maining complex structural elements in a matrix of younger forest. As such, they provide important habitat for wildlife normally associated with older forests such as red tree vole (Arborimus pomo), fisher (Martes pennanti), bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus), peregrine falcon (Falco peregrinus), marbled murrelet (Brachyramphus marmoratus), northern spotted owl (Strix o ccidentalis caurina), Vaux's swift (Chaetura vauxi), and wandering salamand er (Aneides vagrans). Despite the obvious value of these trees to wildlife, and the fact that they are essentially a nonrenewable resource, no regulat ory protection exists for these monetarily valuable trees. Accordingly, we recommend increased retention and management of these resources, as well as increased research on their role in managed forest ecosystems.