Drug resistance in patients experiencing early virological failure under atriple combination including indinavir

Citation
O. Gallego et al., Drug resistance in patients experiencing early virological failure under atriple combination including indinavir, AIDS, 15(13), 2001, pp. 1701-1706
Citations number
34
Categorie Soggetti
Immunology
Journal title
AIDS
ISSN journal
02699370 → ACNP
Volume
15
Issue
13
Year of publication
2001
Pages
1701 - 1706
Database
ISI
SICI code
0269-9370(20010907)15:13<1701:DRIPEE>2.0.ZU;2-I
Abstract
Objective: To assess the pattern of drug resistance mutations selected in H IV-1-infected patients failing a first line triple combination therapy incl uding indinavir. Patients and methods: Plasma samples from 87 patients collected at the time of the first virological rebound (> 50 HIV-RNA copies/ml) were examined fo r the presence of drug-resistant genotypes. Results: The mean level of plasma viraemia at rebound was 7824 HIV-1 RNA co pies/ ml in 73 subjects with good compliance, whereas it was 359 460 HIV-1 RNA copies/ ml in 14 patients who admitted to poor adherence. Genetic seque nce analysis yielded results for 51 (70%) of the patients having good adher ence. More than half of them (26/51, 51%) carried primary mutations associa ted with resistance to nucleoside analogues. In contrast, primary protease inhibitor resistance mutations were recognized less frequently (14/51, 27%; P < 0.05). Moreover, in 23 (45%) patients there was no evidence of drug-re sistant viruses at all. The most frequent drug-resistant genotypes in the r everse transcriptase gene were at codons 184 (n = 19), 215 (n = 14) and 41 (n = 8), whereas for the protease they were at codons 46 (n = 10), 82 (n = 9) and 90 (n = 7). No resistance genotypes were found among non-compliant p atients. Conclusion: The overall rate of drug-resistant HIV genotypes was 38% (28/73 ) in patients with good adherence and who were experiencing a first virolog ical failure under a triple combination regimen including indinavir; resist ance to nucleoside analogues was more frequent than resistance to indinavir . Therefore, treatment intensification in those patients without resistance , or a selective substitution of nucleosides in those with resistance limit ed to these compounds, might be justified. (C) 2001 Lippincott Williams & W ilkins.