This study was aimed at assessing the role of carotid body function in neur
oendocrine and glucoregulatory responses to exercise. The carotid bodies an
d associated nerves were removed (CBR, n = 6), or left intact (Sham, n = 6)
in anesthetized dogs > 16 clays before experiments, and infusion and sampl
ing catheters were implanted. Conscious dogs were studied at rest and durin
g 150 min of exercise. Isotopic dilution was used to Assess glucose product
ion (R-a) and disappearance (R-d). Arterial glucagon was reduced in CBR com
pared with Sham at rest (29 +/- 3 vs. 47 +/- 3 pg/ml). During exercise, glu
cagon increased more in Sham than in CBR (47 +/- 9 vs. 15 +/- 2 pg(ml). Cor
tisol and epinephrine levels were similar in the two groups at rest and dur
ing exercise. Basal norepinephrine was similar in CBR and Sham. During exer
cise, norepinephrine increased by 432 +/- 124 pg/ml in Sham, but by only 20
1 +/- 28 pg(ml. in CBR. Basal arterial plasma glucose was 108 +/- 2 and 105
+/- 2 mg/dl in CBR and Sham, respectively. Arterial glucose dropped by 10
+/- 3 mg/dl at onset of exercise in CBR (P < 0.01), but was unchanged in Sh
am (decrease of 3 2 mg/dl, not significant). Basal glucose kinetics were eq
ual in Sham and CBR. At onset of exercise, R-a and R-d were transiently unc
oupled in CBR (i.e., R-d > R-a) but were closely matched in Sham. In steady
-state exercise, R-a and R-d were closely matched in both groups. Insulin w
as equal in the basal period and decreased similarly during exercise. These
studies, suggest. that input from the carotid bodies, or receptors anatomi
cally close to them, 1) is important in control of basal glucagon and the e
xercise-induced increment in glucagon, 2) is involved in the sympathetic re
sponse to exercise, and 3) participates in., the non-steady-state coupling
of R-a to R-d, but 4) is not essential to glucoregulation during sustained
exercise.