F. Ashkanani et al., What is achieved by mammographic surveillance after breast conservation treatment for breast cancer?, AM J SURG, 182(3), 2001, pp. 207-210
Background: After breast conservation surgery for breast cancer, patients a
re followed up by regular clinical examination and mammography, at interval
s which vary according to local practice. However, the optimum interval rem
ains unclear with current guidelines suggesting mammography should be carri
ed out every 1 to 2 years. This study has investigated this aspect and, in
particular, whether mammography or clinical examination or both allowed an
early detection of recurrence of the disease in the conserved breast.
Methods: A total of 695 patients who had undergone breast conservation surg
ery were identified from a database of prospectively recorded data during t
he period 1990 to 1995. Clinical examination and annual mammography were pe
r-formed in accordance with local protocol. The results of clinical examina
tion, mammography, and local recurrence rates were evaluated.
Results: A total of 2,181 mammograms were undertaken in the 695 patients st
udied. Local recurrence of disease in the conserved breast occurred in 21 p
atients (3%), at a mean follow-up of 3.5 years. The first identification of
tumor recurrence was by clinical examination in 11 patients with local rec
urrence, and by the surveillance mammography in the other 10 patients with
local recurrence. Overall, mammography detected the local recurrence in 13
of 20 (65%) patients who underwent this examination. In the other patients,
the recurrence was detected on clinical examination only. In addition, in
52 patients, mammography was falsely positive, giving a false positive rate
of 2.3%. Contralateral cancers in the opposite breast were detected in 2 p
atients.
Conclusions: The detection of local disease after breast conservation surge
ry requires both clinical examination and mammography. In the context of ou
r follow-up policy, in 52% of patients with local recurrence, this was firs
t identified by clinical examination. Disease recurrence was identified in
the other 48% of patients by mammographic surveillance. Overall, mammograph
y will identify or confirm local recurrence in two thirds of women. However
, in a small number of cases (2.3% in our series) mammography will give fal
se positive results. New imaging modalities to assist in the diagnosis of l
ocal recurrence of disease after breast conservation surgery are required.
(C) 2001 Excerpta Medica, Inc. All rights reserved.