Background: Appendectomy can be performed using either a laparoscopic or an
open technique. This study compares the outcome of patients treated for ac
ute appendicitis by open appendectomy with the outcome of those undergoing
laparoscopic appendectomy.
Methods: Patients undergoing appendectomy at The Mount Sinai Hospital betwe
en 1994 and 1998 were studied. Outcome of patients having open appendectomy
was compared with that of patients having laparoscopic appendectomy.
Results: Seven hundred fifty-eight patients underwent appendectomy for acut
e appendicitis during the 5-year study period. Two hundred seventy-one (36%
) had open appendectomy and 487 (64%) had laparoscopic appendectomy. Patien
ts subsequently found to have a normal appendix had the highest rate of lap
aroscopic appendectomy, whereas those with gangrenous appendicitis were mos
t likely to have open appendectomy (P <0.05). There was a significant decli
ne in the postoperative length of stay for open cases during the length of
the study. In the final year, the difference in length of stay between open
and laparoscopic appendectomy was only 1 day. Patients with gangrenous app
endicitis had a significantly longer length of stay than did patients with
a normal appendix or suppurative appendicitis. The hospital cost of laparos
copic appendectomy was greater than that for open appendectomy but the extr
a expenditure in the operating room was offset by the longer length of stay
of the patients having open surgery.
Conclusions: Differences in outcome between open and laparoscopic appendect
omy are minor. In this study, more difficult cases with gangrenous appendic
itis were more likely to require open appendectomy whereas milder forms of
appendicitis, especially in women, were more likely to be treated by laparo
scopy. Savings from the slightly shorter hospital stay after laparoscopic a
ppendectomy are offset by the higher surgical cost of the laparoscopic equi
pment. (C) 2001 Excerpta Medica, Inc. Ali rights reserved.