OBJECTIVE, To review and summarize the efficacy, mechanisms of action, and
cost of the options available when choosing antiplatelet agents for seconda
ry stroke prevention.
DATA SOURCES: This article is based on a review of the literature found wit
h MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Cochrane Reviews (1980-June 2000) and abstracts from
relevant international scientific meetings. We searched for the terms aspi
rin, ticlopidine, dipyridamole, antiplatelet, and clopidogrel.
STUDY SELECTION: English-language articles, both reviews and original studi
es, were evaluated, and all information considered relevant was included in
this review. In addition, guidelines from the American Heart Association a
re Included.
DATA SYNTHESIS; Aspirin is a relatively inexpensive and effective agent fbr
secondary stroke prevention, and lower doses of aspirin appear as effectiv
e as higher doses. Ticlopidine has been used alone or in combination with a
spirin, but serious adverse effects have limited its use. Clopidogrel has e
merged as a safe and effective alternative to ticlopidine and lacks some of
the serious adverse effects associated with ticlopidine, but is not superi
or to aspirin in secondary stroke prevention. Unlike previous studies, one
recent trial showed that dipyridamole in combination with aspirin is superi
or to aspirin alone.
CONCLUSIONS: Antiplatelet therapy is a key component of secondary preventio
n strategies in ischemic stroke. While aspirin has been the cornerstone in
the management of stroke, other classes of antiplatelet drugs present new o
pportunities to optimize antiplatelet therapy.