This article engages both the "construction of nature" thesis and the proje
ct of legal geography to examine law as a culturally significant site where
in "nature" is produced. Because the meaning of "nature" is often a functio
n of its contrasts with the category "human," to participate in the constru
ction of one is, almost by definition, to participate in the construction o
f the other. After discussing law as a site of cultural production in gener
al terms, this article surveys a range of legal contexts in which the natur
e/human distinction is a central conceptual-political concern. These contex
ts include nature as externality (wilderness), animality (bestiality), and
corporeality (reproductive technologies and the involuntary medication of i
nmates). The article's conclusion addresses the pragmatics of constructivis
m within the context of existing humanist-liberal legal frames of reference
.