EMG biofeedback: The effects of CRF, FR, VR, FI, and VI schedules of reinforcement on the acquisition and extinction of increases in forearm muscle tension
Sl. Cohen et al., EMG biofeedback: The effects of CRF, FR, VR, FI, and VI schedules of reinforcement on the acquisition and extinction of increases in forearm muscle tension, APPL PSY BI, 26(3), 2001, pp. 179-194
Biofeedback was used to increase forearm-muscle tension. Feedback was deliv
ered under continuous reinforcement (CRF), variable interval (VI), fixed in
terval (FI), variable ratio (VR), and fixed ratio (FR) schedules of reinfor
cement when college students increased their muscle tension (electromyograp
h, EMG) above a high threshold. There were three daily sessions of feedback
, and Session 3 was immediately followed by a session without feedback (ext
inction). The CRF schedule resulted in the highest EMG, closely followed by
the FR and VR schedules, and the lowest EMG scores were produced by the FI
and VI schedules. Similarly, the CRF schedule resulted in the greatest amo
unt of time-above-threshold and the VI and FI schedules produced the lowest
time-above-threshold. The highest response rates were generated by the FR
schedule, followed ky the VR schedule. The CRF schedule produced relatively
low response rates, comparable to the rates tinder the VI and Fl schedules
. Some of the data are consistent with the partial-reinforcement-extinction
effect. The present data suggest that different schedules of feedback shou
ld be considered in muscle-strengthening contexts such as during the rehabi
litation of muscles following brain damage or peripheral nervous-system inj
ury.