Benhabib et al. (1991) and Greenwood and Hercowitz (1991) demonstrate
that general equilibrium Beckerian home production models that incorpo
rate separate technology shocks to the home and market production func
tions are able to explain either the comovements in employment across
consumption and investment sectors of the economy or the comovement in
output across market and home investment sectors, but not both simult
aneously. This paper demonstrates that these comovements can be resolv
ed by introducing endogenous growth into the model, while retaining on
ly a single technology shock to market production, The additional marg
in for allocating time between formal training and market activities i
s sufficient to bring about the observed positive comovements in emplo
yment and output across sectors.