BACKGROUND. In the works of various authors, performed with the help of mor
phometry, an assessment of cell changes was carried out, as a rule, by one
sign of their atypia (e.g. area of cell nuclei). Moreover, the selective an
alysis of morphometric data for certain nosologic forms was performed. Such
an approach allowed researchers to develop only additional diagnostic crit
eria of thyroid carcinoma. At the same time, the use of a set of quantitati
ve signs of cell atypia as a criterion for tumor malignancy made it possibl
e to improve oncologic diagnosis. In this study, which is a first step in t
he development of a quantitative approach to thyroid carcinoma diagnosis, a
system of karyometric parameters was developed with the help of morphometr
y of cytologic material of patients with major nosologic forms of thyroid p
athology (papillary and follicular carcinoma, follicular adenoma, autoimmun
e thyroiditis, and nodular colloid and diffuse toxic goiter). The significa
nce of each parameter in thyroid carcinoma diagnosis was evaluated.
METHODS. Thyroid cells of autopsy, operative, and aspiration biopsy materia
l were the object of the study. One hundred fifty-two preparations with his
tologically verified diagnosis were studied. Light morphometry was performe
d with the help of a semiautomatic computer analyzer of images. One hundred
fifty thyroid nuclei were assessed in each preparation.
RESULTS. Among many karyometric parameters, six were selected: mean area of
thyrocyte nuclei, ratio of frequencies, and number of classes on histogram
s of distribution of their area, coefficient and a free term of the regress
ion equation to a scattered diagram of perimeter and nuclear area, and the
discriminant index. Boundary values of these parameters between the maligna
nt and benign pathology were united into an expert system for thyroid carci
noma diagnosis. Clinical trials of the system were performed. On the basis
of the obtained results, the informativity (accuracy, sensitivity, specific
ity) of its karyometric parameters was assessed. The formula for calculatio
n of the weighting coefficient for each parameter was derived, the diagnost
ic index being determined by the sum of their values.
CONCLUSIONS. An expert system was created based on a set of karyometric par
ameters reflecting the regularities of pathologic changes in thyrocyte nucl
ei with malignant and benign pathology. The informativity and weighting coe
fficients included into the system of parameters have been assessed, which
made it possible to perform the probabilistic diagnosis of thyroid carcinom
a. (C) 2001 American Cancer Society.