Temporal increases in the incidence of childhood solid tumors seen in Northwest England (1954-1998) are likely to be real

Citation
Rjq. Mcnally et al., Temporal increases in the incidence of childhood solid tumors seen in Northwest England (1954-1998) are likely to be real, CANCER, 92(7), 2001, pp. 1967-1976
Citations number
25
Categorie Soggetti
Oncology,"Onconogenesis & Cancer Research
Journal title
CANCER
ISSN journal
0008543X → ACNP
Volume
92
Issue
7
Year of publication
2001
Pages
1967 - 1976
Database
ISI
SICI code
0008-543X(20011001)92:7<1967:TIITIO>2.0.ZU;2-I
Abstract
BACKGROUND. There has been speculation that increasing trends in incidence of childhood central nervous system tumors and infant neuroblastoma in the United States have been due to diagnostic improvements or reporting changes . To investigate whether or not such trends could be explained in this way in the U.K., the authors used population-based data from Northwest England to analyze incidence trends in childhood solid tumors. METHODS. Cases were diagnosed during 1954-1998 and were grouped according t o a morphology-based classification scheme. More than 95% of diagnoses were based on special histopathologic review. Tissue sections were retained, an d diagnoses were rereviewed to ensure consistency in classification through out the time period. Age-, gender- and period-specific incidence rates were calculated. Analyses were performed with chi-square tests and Poisson regr ession. RESULTS. There was an overall increase in the incidence of all childhood so lid tumors of 0.9% each year. A temporal increase was found in childhood br ain tumors characterized by, in particular, annual increases of 1% in piloc ytic astrocytoma, 1% in primitive neuroectodermal tumors, and 2.3% in misce llaneous gliomas. The incidence of germ cell tumors increased at a rate of 2.6% each year. CONCLUSIONS. These increases could not be attributed to changes in diagnost ic practice, and it is unlikely that the increases were due to changes in r eporting practice. Further, the restriction of the increases to certain gro ups, with stable rates in others, argued against the changes being artifact ual. The authors concluded that the increases in incidence were likely to b e real. (C) 2001 American Cancer Society.