Can MR measurement of renal artery flow and renal volume predict the outcome of percutaneous transluminal renal angioplasty?

Citation
Ca. Binkert et al., Can MR measurement of renal artery flow and renal volume predict the outcome of percutaneous transluminal renal angioplasty?, CARDIO IN R, 24(4), 2001, pp. 233-239
Citations number
28
Categorie Soggetti
Radiology ,Nuclear Medicine & Imaging
Journal title
CARDIOVASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY
ISSN journal
01741551 → ACNP
Volume
24
Issue
4
Year of publication
2001
Pages
233 - 239
Database
ISI
SICI code
0174-1551(200107/08)24:4<233:CMMORA>2.0.ZU;2-J
Abstract
Purpose: Predicting therapeutic benefit from percutaneous transluminal rena l angioplasty (PTRA) in patients with renal artery stenosis (RAS) remains d ifficult. This study investigates whether magnetic resonance (MR)-based ren al artery flow measurements relative to renal parenchymal volume can predic t clinical outcome following PTRA. Methods: The data on 23 patients (13 men, 10 women; age range 47-82 years, mean age 64 years) were analyzed. The indication for treatment was hyperten sion (n = 18) or renal insufficiency (n = 5). Thirty-four cases of RAS were identified: bilateral disease was manifest in 11 and unilateral disease in 12 patients. The MR imaging protocol included a breath-hold, cardiac-gated cine phase-contrast sequence for renal flow measurement and a fast multipl anar spoiled gradient-echo sequence for renal volume measurement. MR measur ements were performed on the day prior to and the day following PTRA. Clini cal success was defined as (a) a reduction in diastolic blood pressure > 15 % or (b) a reduction in serum creatinine > 20%. Kidneys were categorized as normal volume or low volume. A renal flow index (RFI) was calculated by di viding the renal flow (ml/min) by the renal volume (cm(3)). Results: Clinical success was observed in 11 patients. Twelve patients did not benefit from angioplasty. Normal kidney volume was seen in 10 of 11 res ponders and in 8 of 12 nonresponders, resulting in a sensitivity of 91%, sp ecificity of 33%, a positive predictive value (PPV) of 56% and a negative p redictive value (NPV) of 80%. A RFI below a threshold of 1.5 ml/min/cm(3) p redicted successful outcome with 100% sensitivity, 33% specificity, 58% PPV , and 100% NPV. The combination of normal renal volume and a RFI below 1.5 ml/min/cm(3) identified PTRA responders with a sensitivity of 91%, a specif icity of 67%, a PPV of 71%, and a NPV of 89%. PTRA resulted in a greater in crease in renal flow in responders compared with nonresponders (p < 0.001). Conclusion: A combination of cine phase-contrast MR renal flow and parenchy mal volume measurements enables identification of patients benefiting from PTRA with a high sensitivity and NPV, but only moderate specificity and PPV .