Objectives: To determine whether fundholding patients have shorter wai
ting times for surgery than non-fundholding patients and to establish
if any such differences resulted from practices attaining fundholding
status. Design: Comparison of waiting times of fundholding and non-fun
dholding patients for elective surgery covered by the fundholding sche
me at four providers over four years. Comparison of the waiting times
for patients of practices in their last par outside and first year ins
ide the fundholding scheme with those for patients of practices remain
ing non-fundholding. Setting: West Sussex. Subjects: Over 57 000 patie
nts on the elective waiting list who had operations purchased by a hea
lth authority or fundholding practice during 1992-6. Patients with boo
ked or planned elective admissions were excluded. Main outcome measure
s: Waiting times for patients of fundholding and non-fundholding patie
nts. Results: Patients of fundholding practices had significantly shor
ter waiting times than those of non-fundholders for all four providers
and over all four years. Waiting times for patients did not fall unti
l the year that the practices joined the fundholding scheme. Conclusio
ns: Fundholding shortens waiting times. This may be because purchasing
of elective surgery is best done at a practice level or because fundh
olding practices are funded overgenerously.