INTRODUCTION: There are no previous comparative studies of total abdominal
colectomy by laparoscopic methods in ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease
patients requiring urgent colectomy. This study aimed to determine the saf
ety and efficacy of laparoscopic colectomy in these patients compared with
those undergoing conventional urgent colectomy. METHODS: Patients undergoin
g laparoscopic total colectomy for acute colitis were identified in a prosp
ective registry. All patients underwent a total colectomy with creation of
an end ileostomy and buried mucous fistula. No patient had fulminant diseas
e (tachycardia, fever, marked leukocytosis, peritonitis), but all were fail
ing to respond to medical treatment. Patients undergoing conventional total
colectomy were matched for age, gender, body mass index, diagnosis, diseas
e severity, and operative period. Median values (range) are listed. RESULTS
: From 1997 to 1999, there were 19 laparoscopic and 29 matched conventional
patients. There were no inadvertent colotomies or conversions in the lapar
oscopic group. Although there was no difference in operative blood loss in
the laparoscopic group (100 (range, 50-700) ml) when compared with the conv
entional group (150 (range, 50-500) ml), the operative times were significa
ntly longer in the laparoscopic group (210 (range, 150-270) vs. 120 (range,
60-180) minutes, P < 0.001). Bowel function returned more quickly in the l
aparoscopic group (1 (range, 1-3) vs. 2 (range, 1-4) days; P = 0.003) and t
he length of stay was shorter (4 (range, 3-13) vs. 6 (range, 4-24) days; P
= 0.04). Complications occurred in three (16 percent) laparoscopic patients
(2 wound infection and I ileus) and in seven (24 percent) conventional pat
ients (3 wound infection, 3 deep venous thrombosis, 1 upper gastrointestina
l bleed). CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic total colectomy is feasible and safe in
patients with acute nonfulminant colitis and may lead to a faster recovery
than conventional resection.