Laparoscopic total colectomy for acute colitis - A case-control study

Citation
Pw. Marcello et al., Laparoscopic total colectomy for acute colitis - A case-control study, DIS COL REC, 44(10), 2001, pp. 1441-1445
Citations number
15
Categorie Soggetti
Gastroenerology and Hepatology
Journal title
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM
ISSN journal
00123706 → ACNP
Volume
44
Issue
10
Year of publication
2001
Pages
1441 - 1445
Database
ISI
SICI code
0012-3706(200110)44:10<1441:LTCFAC>2.0.ZU;2-2
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: There are no previous comparative studies of total abdominal colectomy by laparoscopic methods in ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease patients requiring urgent colectomy. This study aimed to determine the saf ety and efficacy of laparoscopic colectomy in these patients compared with those undergoing conventional urgent colectomy. METHODS: Patients undergoin g laparoscopic total colectomy for acute colitis were identified in a prosp ective registry. All patients underwent a total colectomy with creation of an end ileostomy and buried mucous fistula. No patient had fulminant diseas e (tachycardia, fever, marked leukocytosis, peritonitis), but all were fail ing to respond to medical treatment. Patients undergoing conventional total colectomy were matched for age, gender, body mass index, diagnosis, diseas e severity, and operative period. Median values (range) are listed. RESULTS : From 1997 to 1999, there were 19 laparoscopic and 29 matched conventional patients. There were no inadvertent colotomies or conversions in the lapar oscopic group. Although there was no difference in operative blood loss in the laparoscopic group (100 (range, 50-700) ml) when compared with the conv entional group (150 (range, 50-500) ml), the operative times were significa ntly longer in the laparoscopic group (210 (range, 150-270) vs. 120 (range, 60-180) minutes, P < 0.001). Bowel function returned more quickly in the l aparoscopic group (1 (range, 1-3) vs. 2 (range, 1-4) days; P = 0.003) and t he length of stay was shorter (4 (range, 3-13) vs. 6 (range, 4-24) days; P = 0.04). Complications occurred in three (16 percent) laparoscopic patients (2 wound infection and I ileus) and in seven (24 percent) conventional pat ients (3 wound infection, 3 deep venous thrombosis, 1 upper gastrointestina l bleed). CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic total colectomy is feasible and safe in patients with acute nonfulminant colitis and may lead to a faster recovery than conventional resection.