This paper recognises the many contributions to work on environmental value
s while arguing that some reconsideration of elicitation practices is warra
nted. It argues that speaking and thinking about certain environmental valu
es, particularly ethical expressions, are ill-matched with the affectively
neutral, direct question-answer formats standard to willingness-to-pay and
survey methods. Several indirect, narrated, and affectively resonant elicit
ation tasks were used to provide study participants with new opportunities
to express their values. Coded results demonstrate that morally resonant, i
mage-based, and narrative-style elicitation tasks help respondents articula
te a broader range of noncost and nonutilitarian environmental values. Howe
ver, it was found that elicitations of this kind are most useful when prese
nted in a affectively subtle and noncontroversial form. Several suggestions
for synthesising these methods with more structured forms (e.g., surveys,
constructed preferences, etc.) are offered.