Objective: Aim of this study was to evaluate retrospectively: (1) the outco
me in patients with unstable angina (UA) refractory to the medical therapy
undergoing urgent-emergent CABG (2) the influence of both IMAs employment.
Patients and methods: Between January 1995 and July 2000. 576 (28.5%) conse
cutive patients with UA underwent CABG procedure. 182 (31,6%. Group I) pati
ents, presenting unstable hemodynamic or angina pectoris refractory to the
maximal medical therapy, underwent urgent/emergent CABG. 397 (68.4%, Group
II) patients, after the maximal medical therapy did not present angina's ep
isodes or ECG alterations and underwent elective CABG procedure. Preoperati
ve data were similar in the two groups. Both IMAs were used in 68 (37.4%) p
atients of I and 152 (38%) of II (P > 0.05) to left side revascularization.
Results: CAD extension was greater in Group I: 45 (24.7%) patients present
ed ischemia in >1 area vs 53 (13.5%) in II (P < 0.001). Incidence of antero
septal ischemia resulted significantly higher in I (P = 0.017): left main c
oronary artery stenosis was present in 68 (37%) patients in 1 vs 108 (27%)
in II (P = 0.01). LV function resulted significantly depressed in I. demons
trated by a significantly lower LVEF (P < 0.001), higher NYHA class (P < 0.
001) and preoperative incidence of IABP (P < 0.001). Intraoperative data an
alysis did not reveal any difference between groups, Hospital mortality was
13 (7%) and 21 (5.3%) patients in I and II respectively (P = ns). Multivar
iate analysis of all preoperative and intraoperative variables revealed the
age > 65 years (P = 0.01), congestive heart failure (P < 0.001), LVEF < 35
% (P = 0.03). >1 ischemic area (P = 0.02) as strong predictors for poor ove
rall survival. and LIMA (P = 0.006) and both IMAs (P = 0.001) as strong pre
dictors for good overall survival. Actuarial survival at 1, 3 and 5 years r
esulted to be 98.5, 96.5 and 90% in I and 99, 96 and 92% in II (P = ns). Co
nclusion: CABG has been associated with acceptable outcome in patients with
UA which should be applied soonest possible in patients refractory to medi
cal treatment. Total coronary revascularization and employment of both IMAs
for left myocardial side are associated with low operative risk and incide
nce of complications, permit to have acceptable short and long-term outcome
in this pool of patients. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science BN. All rights reserve
d.