U. Sunderdiek et al., Left ventricular dysfunction and disturbed O-2-utilization in stunned myocardium: influence of ischemic preconditioning, EUR J CAR-T, 20(4), 2001, pp. 770-776
Objective: Myocardial dysfunction during postischemic reperfusion is freque
ntly reported only in terms of left ventricular (LV) systolic properties. W
e additionally assessed diastolic properties, the cardiovascular tone and i
n particular. the relation between ventricular function and myocardial oxyg
en consumption. Moreover, these measures are investigated after cardioprote
ction via ischemic preconditioning (IP). However. this phenomenon is not fu
lly understood. and therefore cardioprotective methods like ischemic precon
ditioning might provide only insufficient protection. Methods: In a total o
f 17 isolated rabbit hearts. perfused with an erythrocyte suspension (Hct 3
0%), we investigated the effect of 20 min low-flow ischemia also on diastol
ic properties. coronary resistance and cardiac energetics (n = 9). During c
ontrol and 30 min after the onset of reperfusion. LV systolic function was
assessed in terms of aortic flow. dP/dt(max) and the end-systolic pressure-
volume relation (ESPVR). Early relaxation was evaluated via dP/dt(min) and
diastolic properties were assessed via the end-diastolic pressure-volume re
lation (EDPVR), i.e. using the equation LVPed = c(.)exp(m(.)LVV(ed)), where
c equals the LVPed-axis intercept and ni equals LV stiffness. In addition,
coronary resistance (R-cor and the pressure-volume area (PVA) were calcula
ted. Total oxygen consumption (MVO2) was calculated as well as the contract
ile efficiency (E = inverse slope of the MVO2-PVA relation). In a second se
ries (n = 8) the effect of ischemic preconditioning (3 min no-flow and 8 mi
n reperfusion before the 20 min low-flow ischemia) was tested. Results: In
the first series. systolic function was impaired during reperfusion: aortic
flow to 32% of control. dP/dt(max) to 74% and the slope of ESPVR to 73%. E
arly relaxation in terms of dP/dt(min) decreased to 76%. The slope of the E
DPVR was steeper in stunned myocardium with an increase of the ventricular
stiffness (in increased from 3.2 to 4.1) and with an upward shift of the ED
PVR (c from 0.6 to 2.4 mmHg). Coronary resistance was increased (from 0.9 t
o 1.4 mmHg/ml per min) and PVA was significantly decreased to 68%. whereas
MVO2 was not indicating also a decrease in contractile efficiency E front 2
8 to 14%. In the second series, recovery of systolic function was significa
ntly improved by IP compared with the first series (aortic flow 56% of prei
schemic control. dP/dt(max) to 91% and ESPVR to 78%). LV stiffness m was al
so slightly increased from 3.1 to 3.9 and again. c was elevated. indicating
no beneficial effect for diastolic properties including dP/dt(min) (77%).
But IP improved R-cor significantly (from 0.9 to only 1.0 mmHg/ml per min)
and efficiency E to 21% (from 27% during control). Conclusion: Brief episod
es of ischemia not only induce systolic but also diastolic and vascular stu
nning at almost maintained MVO2. The decreased contractile efficiency clear
iv indicates an impaired O-2-utilization of the contractile apparatus. Isch
emic preconditioning did not improve diastolic function during reperfusion,
but it provided protection with respect to vascular stunning and myocardia
l energetics. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science BN. All rights reserved.