Objectives: In spite of the high prevalence of Pneumocystis carinii (PC) pn
eumonia in immunocompromised patients. little is known about the epidemiolo
gical characteristics of this infection, and whether the cases of PC pneumo
nia in immunosuppressed patients are the result of a reactivation of a late
nt infection or a due to a recent infection is unknown. The aim of this stu
dy was to provide information about the epidemiological characteristics of
PC pneumonia in a cohort of heart transplant (HT) recipients when compared
with the epidemiology of PC infection in a cohort of chronic sputum produce
rs (CSP) representative of the general population of the same geographical
area. Methods: We identified all the cases of PC pneumonia in the cohort of
72 subjects who underwent cardiac transplantation at our institution betwe
en January 1991 and December 1996 and compared them with the cases of PC in
fection identified in a non-selected cohort of 34 CSP. This second group wa
s included to obtain an approximation of the frequency of PC carriers in th
e general population. Identification of PC was accomplished through customa
ry stain techniques and immunofluorescence with monoclonal antibodies. Resu
lts: Of the 72 HT recipients four (5.5%) developed PC pneumonia, but one ha
d two episodes. Only one had received primary chemoprophylaxis, but develop
ed PC pneumonia 2 months after discontinuing prophylactic therapy. PC pneum
onia episodes were produced 53, 102, 230, 181 and 772 days after the moment
of transplant, respectively. PC was identified in two (5.8%) of the 34 CSP
. No significant differences were found when the accumulative incidences of
PC pneumonia in HT patients and PC infection in CSP were compared (P = 0.7
). Conclusions: The frequency of PC pneumonia among HT patients is the same
as the frequency of PC infection in the general population. This observati
on and the long interval between transplantation and the development of PC
pneumonia observed in the study support the hypothesis that the occurrence
of PC pneumonia in immunocompromised patients might be from a new infection
rather than from the reactivation of latent organisms. Therefore, continuo
us prophylaxis might be indicated in areas with a high prevalence of PC for
patients at highest risk. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserv
ed.