Early and late facemask therapy

Citation
S. Yuksel et al., Early and late facemask therapy, EUR J ORTHO, 23(5), 2001, pp. 559-568
Citations number
32
Categorie Soggetti
Dentistry/Oral Surgery & Medicine
Journal title
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS
ISSN journal
01415387 → ACNP
Volume
23
Issue
5
Year of publication
2001
Pages
559 - 568
Database
ISI
SICI code
0141-5387(200110)23:5<559:EALFT>2.0.ZU;2-0
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to determine the dental and skeletal effects of facemask therapy, and to evaluate the effect of age on treatment respons e. The material consisted of lateral cephalometric radiographs of 34 subjec ts with Class IH malocclusions treated with a Delaire type facemask. Two gr oups of 17 patients each were formed: an early (six girls, 11 boys) and a l ate treatment group (eight girls, nine boys). At the beginning of treatment , the mean ages were 9 years 8 months for the early treatment group and 12 years 6 months for the late treatment group. The average treatment time was 7 months for both groups. A control group consisting of 17 children with a mean age of 9 years 5 months was formed that matched only the early treatm ent group according to age, and sagittal dental and skeletal relationships. To differentiate the orthodontic and total effects of the Delaire type fac emask, superimpositions were made. In both treatment groups forward displacement of maxilla and an increase in overjet were found to be statistically significant (P< 0.01). Evaluation o f total superimpositions showed that there was a significant displacement o f maxillary molars and incisors (P< 0.05, early treatment group; P< 0.01, l ate treatment group), while no significant change was observed in local sup erimpositions. Changes in overjet and SNB in the early treatment group show ed a significant difference compared with the control group (P< 0.001) The increase in Co-A and the decreases in the maxillo-mandibular differential a nd Wits' appraisal showed significant differences compared with the control group (P< 0.01). No significant difference was observed in skeletal and de ntal antero-posterior changes between the treatment groups.