Transvaginal ovarian drilling: a new surgical treatment for improving the clinical outcome of assisted reproductive technologies in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome

Citation
Ap. Ferraretti et al., Transvaginal ovarian drilling: a new surgical treatment for improving the clinical outcome of assisted reproductive technologies in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome, FERT STERIL, 76(4), 2001, pp. 812-816
Citations number
28
Categorie Soggetti
Reproductive Medicine","da verificare
Journal title
FERTILITY AND STERILITY
ISSN journal
00150282 → ACNP
Volume
76
Issue
4
Year of publication
2001
Pages
812 - 816
Database
ISI
SICI code
0015-0282(200110)76:4<812:TODANS>2.0.ZU;2-G
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of transvaginal ovarian drilling (TVOD) in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) who were undergoing IVF treatment. Design: Pilot study. Setting: Reproductive medicine unit. Patient(s): Eleven patients with PCOS undergoing treatment with assisted re productive technology (ART). Intervention(s): Selection criterion for TVOD was repeated poor performance in greater than or equal to2 previous IVF cycles. Main Outcome Measure(s): Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation parameters, nu mber of eggs collected, fertilization rate. embryo cleavage rate, implantat ion rate, pregnancy rate compared with the cycles before TVOD. Result(s): In the cycle after TVOD, a significantly higher dosage of FSH wa s used (33.5 +/- 12 IU vs. 52.2 +/- 15 IU) to collect a higher number of oo cytes in the presence of similar E-2 values at the day of hCG administratio n. This resulted in significantly higher fertilization and cleavage rates ( 27% vs. 66% and 54% vs. 72%, respectively). The pregnancy and the implantat ion rates after TVOD were similar to those for normovulatory patients under going IVF for tubal factor infertility during the study period. Conclusion(s): Our data suggest that the TVOD is effective in improving IVF results in difficult to treat patients with PCOS, and it is less invasive and less expensive when compared with laparoscopic ovarian diathermy. (Fert il Steril(R) 2001;76:812-6. (C) 2001 by American Society for Reproductive M edicine.).