Residual chemical control for Melanoplus differentialis (Orthoptera : Acrididae) in urban landscapes

Citation
Ja. Reinert et al., Residual chemical control for Melanoplus differentialis (Orthoptera : Acrididae) in urban landscapes, FLA ENTOMOL, 84(3), 2001, pp. 380-384
Citations number
8
Categorie Soggetti
Entomology/Pest Control
Journal title
FLORIDA ENTOMOLOGIST
ISSN journal
00154040 → ACNP
Volume
84
Issue
3
Year of publication
2001
Pages
380 - 384
Database
ISI
SICI code
0015-4040(200109)84:3<380:RCCFMD>2.0.ZU;2-D
Abstract
Melanoplus differentialis (Thomas) (Orthoptera: Acrididae) and several othe r species of grasshoppers invade urban/suburban landscapes and retail/whole sale nurseries during the hot, dry summers in the southern United States to consume the foliage of many species of landscape plants and turfgrass. Two experiments were conducted to determine which insecticides could be used t o safely provide residual control for the continual daily migration of gras shoppers in urban landscapes and nurseries. Leaves from treated Hibiscus mo scheutos were harvested sequentially in time at 1-, 5-, and 11-days posttre atment and adult differential grasshoppers were confined on them for 24-, 4 8- and 72-hr exposures. Treatments with two synthetic pyrethroids, bifenthr in 0.66F (0.782 ml/liter) and lambda-cyhalothrin 9.52 Wp (0.748 g/liter), p rovided 94 and 83%, mortality respectively, with 24-hr exposure to the 1-da y-old treated leaves. Both chemicals provided 100% control of the grasshopp ers during 72-hr exposure. The half rate (0.391 ml/liter) of bifenthrin als o provided 89% control within the 72-hr evaluation. Treatments with diazino n AG600 (4.25 ml/liter) also provided 80-85% control with 72-hr exposure on the 1-day-old treated leaves. Acephate 75% S (0.803 g/liter) provided 33-3 9% control on the 1-day-old residues. Lambda-cyhalothrin provided 84% contr ol with 72-hr exposure to the 5-day-old treated leaves. Residual control wa s also provided at 5 days by bifenthrin and acephate (53% and 46-50%, respe ctively). Most materials evaluated failed to provide any protection at all and none of the treatments provided residual control when grasshoppers were exposed to 11-day-old residues. No phytotoxicity to hibiscus was observed due to any of the treatments.