Em. Sluijs et al., The impact of legislative versus non-legislative quality policy in health care: a comparison between two countries, HEALTH POLI, 58(2), 2001, pp. 99-119
Citations number
25
Categorie Soggetti
Public Health & Health Care Science","Health Care Sciences & Services
An important aim of the government's quality policy is to stimulate quality
management (QM) in health care organizations. The relationship between the
government's quality policy and QM in health care organizations is unknown
. This article explores that relationship by comparing two countries with d
ifferent quality policies, The Netherlands and Finland. In The Netherlands
QM is required by law and health care is organized at national level. In Fi
nland, QM is not required by law and the responsibilities for organizing he
alth care are delegated to the m unicipalities. The question is whether or
not these differences in national policy are reflected in the extent and ef
fectiveness of QM in health care organizations in the two countries. A cros
s sectional survey was conducted in late 1999. Data about QM in both countr
ies were gathered by questionnaire. The subsectors involved were hospitals,
care for the disabled and care for the elderly. A total of 1172 health car
e organizations participated in the study (response rate 64%). The results
show that-in keeping with our hypothesis-slightly more QM-activities and mo
re patient participation were found in Dutch health care organizations comp
ared with the Finnish ones. However, contrary to our expectations, the Finn
ish organizations reported more perceived effects of their QM-activities. F
urther analyses showed that some QM-activities are more closely related to
the effectiveness of QM than others. In particular, cyclic quality improvem
ent procedures, human resource management and the flexible attitude of empl
oyees showed the strongest relationship with the perceived effects of QM. T
he difference between the national approach in The Netherlands and the dece
ntralized approach in Finland did not, as we had assumed, result in more re
gional variation in QM in Finland. Conclusions: a government's quality poli
cy may have sonic influence on the extent of QM in health care organization
s. However, more QM-activities do not necessarily imply more effects. Recom
mendations: since QM-activities differ in the degree to which they bring ab
out changes and improvements in care, it is recommended that policy makers
promote those QM-activities, which are the most potent, in order to improve
the quality of care. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights res
erved.