Objective. To calculate the cost-effectiveness, expressed in dollars per qu
ality-adjusted life years (QALY), of increasing measles immunization rates.
Data Sources/Study Design. Published data were supplemented by expert opini
on. We determined the cost savings and value of the health benefits from av
erting a single case of measles. Next we examined the U. S. data regarding
the relationship between pre-school measles immunization and incidence rate
s. Finally, we calculated the cost-effectiveness of a program that would in
crease a locality's immunization rate to the point of disease elimination.
Principal Findings. Averting a single case of measles, using "base case" as
sumptions, yields societal cost savings of $2,089 and an increase of 0.086
QALYs. Using a very low discount rate increases the total benefits to $2,25
1 in societal cost savings and 0.150 QALYs in health benefits. In general,
programs to raise measles immunization rates are not cost-effective, except
possibly during an outbreak of the disease or in areas with very low immun
ization rates. The extremely low measles incidence rates in the mid-1990s r
esult in such programs having extremely high costs per QALY gained.
Conclusions. Programs that are narrowly designed to increase immunization r
ates alone are not likely to be cost-effective. Yet these programs do have
the potential to be cost-effective if the program design and evaluation als
o recognize the benefits associated with the primary and preventive care th
at can accompany immunizations. Such programs may also be cost-effective if
they are components of a global eradication of measles.