Double-blind randomized trial of mifepristone in combination with vaginal gemeprost or misoprostol for induction of abortion up to 63 days gestation

Citation
J. Bartley et al., Double-blind randomized trial of mifepristone in combination with vaginal gemeprost or misoprostol for induction of abortion up to 63 days gestation, HUM REPR, 16(10), 2001, pp. 2098-2102
Citations number
24
Categorie Soggetti
Reproductive Medicine","da verificare
Journal title
HUMAN REPRODUCTION
ISSN journal
02681161 → ACNP
Volume
16
Issue
10
Year of publication
2001
Pages
2098 - 2102
Database
ISI
SICI code
0268-1161(200110)16:10<2098:DRTOMI>2.0.ZU;2-9
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Gemeprost and misoprostol are two of the most widely used prost aglandins in combination with mifepristone for medical abortion in early pr egnancy. However, the efficacy and side-effects of those two drugs given va ginally have not been assessed in a randomized trial. METHODS: Randomized d ouble-blind controlled trial involving 999 women undergoing an abortion at gestational age less than or equal to 63 days who received either 0.5 mg ge meprost (group 1, n = 499) or 800 mug misoprostol (group II, n = 500) vagin ally similar to 48 h after taking 200 mg mifepristone by mouth. The rate of complete abortion and the side-effects were compared between the groups. R ESULTS: A total of 89 cases was excluded from full analysis of outcome beca use either they aborted after mifepristone alone (n = 2), had an ectopic pr egnancy (n = 1), or because the outcome was uncertain as they failed to att end their follow-up appointment (n = 86). The rate of complete abortion was very high (> 95%) in both groups but significantly higher after treatment with misoprostol than with gemeprost [436/453 (98.7%) versus 451/457 (96.2% ), P = 0.019, difference 2.5%, confidence interval 0.4-4.7%] and there were fewer ongoing pregnancies (n = I versus n = 8, P < 0.018). Surgical interv ention rose significantly with gestation in women who received gemeprost (P < 0.03) but not with misoprostol. The incidence of side-effects such as di arrhoea (13.7 versus 16.4%) and vomiting (27.8 versus 29.7%) was similar in women who received misoprostol or gemeprost respectively, as was the durat ion and amount of bleeding. CONCLUSIONS: (i) Both regimens using a reduced dose of mifepristone are highly effective. methods of inducing abortion in early pregnancy; (ii) vaginal misoprostol is the preferred prostaglandin be cause it is it is associated with fewer failures than low-dose gemeprost, p articularly at gestation greater than or equal to 49 days.