Midwives' perceptions of the use of technology in assisting childbirth in Northern Ireland

Citation
M. Sinclair et J. Gardner, Midwives' perceptions of the use of technology in assisting childbirth in Northern Ireland, J ADV NURS, 36(2), 2001, pp. 229-236
Citations number
14
Categorie Soggetti
Public Health & Health Care Science
Journal title
JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING
ISSN journal
03092402 → ACNP
Volume
36
Issue
2
Year of publication
2001
Pages
229 - 236
Database
ISI
SICI code
0309-2402(200110)36:2<229:MPOTUO>2.0.ZU;2-0
Abstract
Aim of the paper. The aim of this paper is to report a survey of midwives' views on Aim the use of technology in assisting births. Background. The research was designed to provide a deeper understanding of the integration of technology into midwives' practice and to identify and e xamine aspects of training needs. Methods. Over 400 midwives responded to a questionnaire seeking information on their experiences and perceived competence with labour ward technology, with a particular focus on the use of cardiotocograph machines (CTGs) for electronic foetal monitoring. The survey sought views on the extent to whic h midwives trust the technology, their perceived levels of training and com petence, their awareness of policy relating to technological intervention a nd the issue of women's choice in whether the progress of their delivery is technologically monitored. Findings. The majority of midwives in this survey trust the use of technolo gy but have concerns about issues of safety in relation to potential faults , and to their perceived lack of training in technology usage. The majority also indicated that they prefer a nontechnological birth although many poi nt to the benefits of technological support when difficulties are encounter ed. The use of technology is seen as multi-professional and there was much support among the respondents for multidisciplinary training in the use of technologies in future curricula. Conclusions. If the various findings of this sample survey were to be conso lidated for midwives as a whole, they suggest that provisions for continuin g professional development may need to address technological awareness and competence in a more focused manner than is discernible at present.