G. Barroso et al., High FSH : LH ratio and low LH levels in basal cycle day 3: Impact on follicular development and IVF outcome, J AS REPROD, 18(9), 2001, pp. 499-505
Purpose. To examine the impact of low basal cycle day 3 serum LH levels or
a high FSH.-LH ratio on IVF results.
Methods. A homogeneous group of patients was analyzed as identified by norm
al basal cycle of follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), Luteinizing hormone (
LH), and estradiol (E-2) levels. High responders (high LH:FSH ratio) and lo
w responders (high FSH or E2 levels, and women greater than or equal to 42
years of age) were excluded from analysis. Only cycles stimulated with a co
mbination of a GnRHa (luteal suppression) and pure FSH were studied.
Results. Patients with low basal LH levels (<3 mIU/mL) did not differ signi
ficantly from controls in terms of response to controlled ovarian hyperstim
ulation but there was a clear trend toward poorer implantation and clinical
pregnancy rates. On the other hand, patients with a high FSH.-LH ratio (>3
) had significantly fewer mature oocytes aspirated, and lower implantation
and clinical pregnancy rates than patients with gonadotropin ratio <3. Thes
e negative effects were evident in the presence of normal basal FSH levels
and after adequate matching of female's age and number of embryos transferr
ed.
Conclusions. These studies highlight a negative impact of a basal cycle hig
h FSH.-LH ratio (and possibly low LH levels) on follicular development and
oocyte quality in these patients subjected to pituitary down-regulation fol
lowed by pure FSH administration. A high FSH.-LH ratio may be therefore use
d as an early biomarker of poor ovarian response.