IMPROVED REPRODUCIBILITY OF MEASUREMENTS WITH THE NERVE-FIBER ANALYZER

Citation
Mjh. Tjonfosang et al., IMPROVED REPRODUCIBILITY OF MEASUREMENTS WITH THE NERVE-FIBER ANALYZER, Journal of glaucoma, 6(4), 1997, pp. 203-211
Citations number
12
Categorie Soggetti
Ophthalmology
Journal title
ISSN journal
10570829
Volume
6
Issue
4
Year of publication
1997
Pages
203 - 211
Database
ISI
SICI code
1057-0829(1997)6:4<203:IROMWT>2.0.ZU;2-R
Abstract
Purpose: This study was undertaken to assess and improve the repeatabi lity and reproducibility of nerve fiber layer (NFL) measurements using the Nerve Fiber Analyzer (NFA I), a scanning laser polarimeter. Metho ds: The repeatability of two subsequent measurements was determined in 100 healthy eyes. Four methods of image evaluation were performed. Po larimetric measurements of retinal NFL were obtained along a peripapil lary band at the superior and inferior poles of the optic disk and ana lyzed in a one-pixel band of absolute retardation values (method 1) an d relative to the nasal segment (method 2). Method 3 used measurements obtained in a 10-pixel band along the same peripapillary band. Method 4 comprised measurements in selected areas outside the peripapillary band, which did not contain blood vessels. The repeatability (r) and r elative reliability coefficient (Rel) were assessed as indices of agre ement of repeated measurements. In addition, the reproducibility (R) f rom day to day for methods 3 and 4 was assessed by taking 10 images on 10 consecutive days from each of 10 subjects. Results: The 95% critic al value for r in the superior and inferior segments improved from abo ut 30% for methods 1 and 2, to 23% for method 3, and to 11% for method 4. For the superior and inferior segments, the fourth method of image evaluation yielded a Rel of 98%, as compared with 54% in method 1, 80 % in method 2, and 87% in method 3. The 95% critical value for R was 2 3% for method 3 but only 15% for method 4. Conclusions: The improved r eproducibility of measurements has made the NFA I a promising device. An improved reproducibility (smaller limit for detecting change) does not necessarily indicate good sensitivity and specificity for any inst rument. The role of the scanning laser polarimeter in clinical practic e requires further study.