The range of specificity and the response properties of the extrastriate fa
ce area were investigated by comparing the N170 event-related potential (ER
P) component elicited by photographs of natural faces, realistically painte
d portraits, sketches of faces, schematic faces, and by nonface meaningful
and meaningless visual stimuli. Results showed that the N170 distinguished
between faces and nonface stimuli when the concept of a face was clearly re
ndered by the visual stimulus, but it did not distinguish among different f
ace types: Even a schematic face made from simple line fragments triggered
the N170. However, in a second experiment, inversion seemed to have a diffe
rent effect on natural faces in which face components were available and on
the pure gestalt-based schematic faces: The N170 amplitude was enhanced wh
en natural faces were presented upside down but reduced when schematic face
s were inverted. Inversion delayed the N170 peak latency for both natural a
nd schematic faces. Together, these results suggest that early face process
ing in the human brain is subserved by a multiple-component neural system i
n which both whole-face configurations and face parts are processed. The re
lative involvement of the two perceptual processes is probably determined b
y whether the physiognomic value of the stimuli depends upon holistic confi
guration, or whether the individual components can be associated with faces
even when presented outside the face context.