Cm. Mannion et al., Management of early-instar Japanese beetle (Coleoptera : Scarabaeidae) in field-grown nursery crops, J ECON ENT, 94(5), 2001, pp. 1151-1161
Numerous fleld studies were conducted in commercial nurseries in Tennessee
from 1996 through 1999 to evaluate chemical and biological treatments, appl
ication timing and rates, and method of application for control of early in
stars of Japanese beetle, Popillia japonica Newman. Insecticide treatments
included bifenthrin, bendiocarb, chlorpyrifos, carbaryl, fipronil, halofeno
zide, imidacloprid, permethrin, tefluthrin, thiamethoxam, and trichlorfon.
Biological treatments included entomopathogenic nematodes (Heterorhabditis
bacteriophora HP88 or H. marelatus), Bacillus thuringiensis Berliner subspe
cies japonensis Buibui strain, and Beauveria bassiana (Balsamo) Vuillemin,
All treatments were applied on the soil surface or injected into the soil a
round the base of each tree. Tree type and size varied among and within tes
ts, however, the sampling unit (61-cm-diameter root ball) remained the same
throughout all tests. The biological treatments provided poor-to-moderate
control (0-75%) of Japanese beetle larvae. Imidacloprid was the most freque
ntly evaluated insecticide and achieved 91-100, 87-100, 83-100, and 41-100%
control with applications in May, June, July, and August, respectively. Ha
lofenozide treatments were not sig nificantly different from imiducloprid t
reatments with one exception. Halofenozide provided 60-87, 85-100, and 82-9
2 control with applications made in June, July, and August, respectively. F
ipronil and thiamethoxam were evaluated to a lesser extent but both perform
ed similarly to imidacloprid. Most other insecticide treatments were less s
uccessful in reducing numbers of Japanese beetle larvae and with few except
ions achieved < 50% control.