OBJECTIVE We developed a typology of physicians' responses to patients' exp
ressed mental health needs to better understand the gap between idealized p
ractice and actual care for emotional distress and mental health problems.
STUDY DESIGN We used a multimethod comparative case study design of 18 fami
ly practices that included detailed descriptive field notes from direct obs
ervation of 1637 outpatient visits. An immersion/crystallization approach w
as used to explore physicians' responses to emotional distress and apparent
mental health issues.
POPULATION A total of 379 outpatient encounters were reviewed from a purpos
eful sample of 13 family physicians from the 57 clinicians observed.
OUTCOMES MEASURED Descriptive field notes of outpatient visits were examine
d for emotional content and physicians' responses to emotional distress.
RESULTS Analyses revealed a 3-phase process by which physicians responded t
o emotional distress: recognition, triage, and management. The analyses als
o uncovered a 4-quadrant typology of management based on the physician's ph
ilosophy (biomedical vs; holistic) and skill level (basic vs more advanced)
.
CONCLUSIONS Physicians appear to manage mental health issues by using 1 of
4 approaches based on their philosophy and core set of skills. Physician ed
ucation and practice improvement should be tailored to build on physicians'
natural philosophical proclivity and psychosocial skills.