Sulfide accumulation due to bacterial sulfate reduction is responsible for
a number of serious problems in the oil industry. Among the strategies to c
ontrol the activity of sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB) is the use of nitrat
e, which can exhibit a variety of effects. We investigated the relevance of
this approach to souring oil fields in Oklahoma and Alberta in which water
flooding is used to enhance oil recovery. SRB and nitrate-reducing bacteri
a (NRB) were enumerated in produced waters from both oil fields. In the Okl
ahoma field, the rates of sulfate reduction ranged from 0.05 to 0.16 muM S
day(-1) at the wellheads, and an order of magnitude higher at the oil-water
separator. Sulfide production was greatest in the water storage tanks in t
he Alberta field. Microbial counts alone did not accurately reflect the pot
ential for microbial activities. The majority of the sulfide production app
eared to occur after the oil was pumped aboveground, rather than in the res
ervoir. Laboratory experiments showed that adding 5 and 10 mM nitrate to pr
oduced waters from the Oklahoma and Alberta oil fields, respectively, decre
ased the sulfide content to negligible levels and increased the numbers of
NRB. This work suggests that sulfate reduction control measures can be conc
entrated on aboveground facilities, which will decrease the amount of sulfi
de reinjected into reservoirs during the disposal of oil field production w
aters.