In many legal systems, the proportionality principle is an important tool f
or judges to check the regulatory freedom of governments. In EC law, for ex
ample, the proportionality principle is one of the most important unwritten
principles commonly invoked before the European Court of Justice in challe
nging EU legislation. Likewise, the proportionality principle could also pl
ay a significant role in WTO law when judging regulations of WTO Members. T
his article analyses the status of this principle in WTO law, looking at th
ree different areas of WTO law where proportionality requirements have been
explored: countermeasures, the TBT and SPS Agreements, and Article XX of G
ATT. The experience in these three areas shows that the proportionality pri
nciple has not yet been recognized as an unwritten principle of WTO law. Ra
ther, requirements of proportionality depend on the actual language found i
n the text of the relevant provisions. Sometimes more specific provisions w
ill limit the proportionality principle's relevance as is the case for coun
termeasures. In other cases, obligations that could result from a hypotheti
cal over-arching WTO proportionality principle are specifically provided in
the text of the agreements. However, depending on the language of the prov
ision at stake, the implications of the proportionality requirements will d
iffer. In sum, there is not one single overarching (unwritten) proportional
ity principle in WTO law. Furthermore, this article submits that at this st
age of the WTO's development, it would not be appropriate for the WTO dispu
te settlement organs to assert such a principle.