Continuous thermometry during a hyperthermic procedure may help to correct
for local differences in heat conduction and energy absorption, and thus al
low optimization of the thermal therapy. Noninvasive, three-dimensional map
ping of temperature changes is feasible with magnetic resonance (MR) and ma
y be based on the relaxation time T-1, the diffusion coefficient (D), or pr
oton resonance frequency (PRF) of tissue water. The use of temperature-sens
itive contrast agents and proton spectroscopic imaging can provide absolute
temperature measurements. The principles and performance of these methods
are reviewed in this paper. The excellent linearity and near-independence w
ith respect to tissue type, together with good temperature sensitivity, mak
e PRP-based temperature AM the preferred choice for many applications at mi
d to high field strength (greater than or equal to1 T). The PRF methods emp
loy radiofrequency spoiled gradient-echo imaging methods. A standard deviat
ion of less than VC, for a temporal resolution below 1 second and a spatial
resolution of about 2 mm, is feasible for a single slice for immobile tiss
ues. Corrections should be made for temperature-induced susceptibility effe
cts in the PRF method. If spin-echo methods are preferred, for example when
field homogeneity is poor due to small ferromagnetic parts in the needle,
the D- and T-1-based methods may give better results. The sensitivity of th
e D method is higher that that of the T-1 methods provided that motion arti
facts are avoided and the trace of D is evaluated. Pat suppression is neces
sary for most tissues when T1, D, or PRF methods are employed. The latter t
hree methods require excellent registration to correct for displacements be
tween scans. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2000; 12:525-533. (C) 2000 Wiley-Liss,
Inc.