DNA extracts from sediment and water samples are often contaminated with co
extracted humic-like impurities, Estuarine humic substances and vascular pl
ant extract were used to evaluate the effect of the presence of such impuri
ties on DNA hybridization and quantification. The presence of humic substan
ces and vascular plant extract interfered with the fluorometric measurement
of DNA concentration using Hoechst dye H33258 and PicoGreen reagent. Quant
ification of DNA amended with humic substances (20-80 ng/mul) using the Hoe
chst dye assay was more reliable than with PicoGreen reagent. A simple proc
edure was developed to improve the accuracy for determining the DNA concent
ration in the presence of humic substances. In samples containing up to 80
ng/mul of humic acids, the fluorescence of the samples were measured twice:
first without Hoechst dye to ascertain any fluorescence from impurities in
the DNA sample, followed with Hoechst dye addition to obtain the total sam
ple fluorescence. The fluorescence of the Hoechst dye-DNA complex was calcu
lated by subtracting the fluorescence of the impurities from the fluorescen
ce of the sample. Vascular plant extract and humic substances reduced the b
inding of DNA onto the nylon membrane. Low amounts (< 2.0 mug) of humic sub
stances derived from estuarine waters did not affect the binding of 100 ng
of target DNA to nylon membranes. DNA samples containing 1.0 mug of humic s
ubstances performed well in DNA hybridizations with DIG-labeled oliogonucle
otide and chromosomal probes. Therefore, we suggest that DNA samples contai
ning low concentrations of humic substances (< 20 ng/mul) could be used in
quantitative membrane hybridization without further purification. (C) 2001
Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.