DNA cleavage by type III restriction-modification enzyme EcoP15I is independent of spacer distance between two head to head oriented recognition sites

Citation
M. Mucke et al., DNA cleavage by type III restriction-modification enzyme EcoP15I is independent of spacer distance between two head to head oriented recognition sites, J MOL BIOL, 312(4), 2001, pp. 687-698
Citations number
42
Categorie Soggetti
Molecular Biology & Genetics
Journal title
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
ISSN journal
00222836 → ACNP
Volume
312
Issue
4
Year of publication
2001
Pages
687 - 698
Database
ISI
SICI code
0022-2836(20010928)312:4<687:DCBTIR>2.0.ZU;2-K
Abstract
The type III restriction-modification enzyme EcoP151 requires the interacti on of two unmethylated, inversely oriented recognition sites 5'-CAGCAG in h ead to head configuration to allow an efficient DNA cleavage. It has been h ypothesized that two convergent DNA-translocating enzyme-substrate complexe s interact to form the active cleavage complex and that translocation is dr iven by ATP hydrolysis. Using a half-automated, fluorescence-based detectio n method, we investigated how the distance between two inversely oriented r ecognition sites affects DNA cleavage efficiency. We determined that EcoP15 1 cleaves DNA efficiently even for two adjacent head to head or tail to tai l oriented target sites. Hence, DNA translocation appears not to be require d for initiating DNA cleavage in these cases. Furthermore, we report here t hat EcoP151 is able to cleave single-site substrates. When we analyzed the interaction of EcoP151 with DNA substrates containing adjacent target sites in the presence of non-hydrolyzable ATP analogues, we found that cleavage depended on the hydrolysis of ATP. Moreover, we show that cleavage occurs a t only one of the two possible cleavage positions of an interacting pair of target sequences. When EcoP151 bound to a DNA substrate containing one rec ognition site in the absence of ATP, we observed a 36 nucleotide DNaseI-foo tprint that is asymmetric on both strands. All of our footprinting experime nts showed chat the enzyme did not cover the region around the cleavage sit e. Analyzing a DNA fragment with two head to head oriented recognition site s, EcoP151 protected 27-33 nucleotides around the recognition sequence, inc luding an additional region of 26 bp between both cleavage sites. For all D NA substrates examined, the presence of ATP caused altered footprinting pat terns. We assume that the altered patterns are most likely due to a conform ational change of the enzyme. Overall, our data further refine the tracking -collision model for type III restriction enzymes. (C) 2001 Academic Press.