Mn. Shadlen et Wt. Newsome, Neural basis of a perceptual decision in the parietal cortex (area LIP) ofthe rhesus monkey, J NEUROPHYS, 86(4), 2001, pp. 1916-1936
We recorded the activity of single neurons in the posterior parietal cortex
(area LIP) of two rhesus monkeys while they discriminated the direction of
motion in random-dot visual stimuli. The visual task was similar to a moti
on discrimination task that has been used in previous investigations of mot
ion-sensitive regions of the extrastriate cortex. The monkeys were trained
to decide whether the direction of motion was toward one of two choice targ
ets that appeared on either side of the random-dot stimulus. At the end of
the trial, the monkeys reported their direction judgment by making an eye m
ovement to the appropriate target. We studied neurons in LIP that exhibited
spatially selective persistent activity during delayed saccadic eye moveme
nt tasks. These neurons are thought to carry high-level signals appropriate
for identifying salient visual targets and for guiding saccadic eye moveme
nts. We arranged the motion discrimination task so that one of the choice t
argets was in the LIP neuron's response field (RF) while the other target w
as positioned well away from the RE During motion viewing, neurons in LIP a
ltered their firing rate in a manner that predicted the saccadic eye moveme
nt that the monkey would make at the end of the trial. The activity thus pr
edicted the monkey's judgment of motion direction. This predictive activity
began early in the motion-viewing period and became increasingly reliable
as the monkey viewed the random-dot motion. The neural activity predicted t
he monkey's direction judgment on both easy and difficult trials (strong an
d weak motion), whether or not the judgment was correct. In addition, the t
iming and magnitude of the response was affected by the strength of the mot
ion signal in the stimulus. When the direction of motion was toward the RF,
stronger motion led to larger neural responses earlier in the motion-viewi
ng period. When motion was away from the RF, stronger motion led to greater
suppression of ongoing activity. Thus the activity of single neurons in ar
ea LIP reflects both the direction of an impending gaze shift and the quali
ty of the sensory information that instructs such a response. The time cour
se of the neural response suggests that LIP accumulates sensory signals rel
evant to the selection of a target for an eye movement.